Thursday, July 9, 2009

Description and Evaluation of Inquiry-Based Lessons

Second blog entry--Week of July 6th

The Grickle-grass Gazette is a WebQuest based on the story, The Lorax, by Dr. Seuss. It is an Inquiry-based lesson on the environment. What makes a WebQuest special is that it is a web-based assignment. Although all assignments might be turned in on paper, the format of the assignment, and all phases there-of, are posted on the Internet. Completed in 2001, this WebQuest holds true and does get the students to think about the bigger picture, “What can I do to help the environment?” After viewing a number of different WebQuests and Inquiry-based lessons, I have found that they tend to follow basically the same format, with most features being the same. It seems they all have an Introduction to start. In the Introduction, the WebQuest/Inquiry-based lesson describes what is going to be the basis for the assignment. In the case of this WebQuest, it is saving the environment.

After the Introduction, this particular lesson has a “Learners” page. Here, the intended audience for this assignment explained (2nd – 4th grade students for this one) and gives a brief summary of what the students will need to know in order to complete the WebQuest. I feel that this is important because it breaks down into different steps what skills will be needed and allows for students to get practice in each of these skills. This was a step that was not listed on the other WebQuests I viewed.

After the Learners page comes the Standards page. On this page, the curriculum standards are listed so that teachers know what aspects of the curriculum is being focused on. Multiple subjects and their curricular standards can be listed if need be. Again, this was for this WebQuest only and did not appear on others I viewed.

Familiar to all the WebQuests I looked at was the Process page. On this page are the steps that need to be followed and (ideally) the order that they should be followed in. This is an important piece to the WebQuest because it helps the students budget their time and it also provides a checklist of sorts to help them stay focused in terms of what they have completed or what they still need to do.

On The Lorax WebQuest, the next page was Resources, which was unique to this lesson. It simply listed the resources that were used (text, websites, videos, technology) to create this WebQuest.

Next comes the Evaluation page, which includes the rubric that the students will be assessed by. On this page, a rubric was used. However, on another WebQuest I viewed, the Evaluation was questions to ask yourself to make sure you accomplished in the process step of the WebQuest. There was no specific rubric listed, just reminders to make sure certain points were made during the process stage.

In the Conclusion page of the WebQuests I looked at was where it seemed like the “inquiry” question was asked. It seems like this is where the project was concluded and the upper level thinking was summarized.

I viewed a number of WebQuests for this assignment. After viewing them I better realize what a WebQuest is, the components that make them up, and have ideas for future creation of multiple WebQuests for my students. One thing is for certain...make sure that any links remain unbroken so that users can accomplish your assignments without running into problems.

2 comments:

  1. I too saw many WebQuests that had broken links and were not updated. I suppose that is to be expected with the ever-changing Internet.

    I found it interesting that this particular WebQuest didn't have a rubric. All of the ones I saw had one. Some weren't written well and others were very specific. I would imagine that it would be good practice to give the students as much information as possible concerning the expectations of the activity. One rubric I saw was not written in student- friendly language, therefore most likely confusing the students. I'm wondering if you found the list of reminders enough for the students completing this particular WebQuest?

    ReplyDelete
  2. Hi Todd!

    Thank you for providing some valuable information for me! The most valuable statement you made was the last line about broken links. I looked through many WebQuests in order to decide which one I would evaluate. On many, the link was broken. But the worst part was the broken internal links. I found what I thought was a good one, and was happily reading down the page, thinking ‘this could be it!’ Alas, no such luck for me!

    Therefore, I made the decision to have the same rule about WebQuests as teachers have about books. When a student is determining whether or not the reading level of a certain book is appropriate, the rule is if there are more than five words you don’t know on the page, you may want to choose another book. Well, I decided that WebQuests get the same rule; five broken links on the page, well, you may want to choose another Quest.

    What do you think?

    Always gotta have some humor…

    Kathryn


    Always gotta have some humor…Kathryn

    ReplyDelete